<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never Buy Lonely Planet (Why?)</title>
	<link>http://bigtravelweb.com/travel/2008/04/14/never-buy-lonely-planet-why/</link>
	<description>Ultimate South America travel tips on hotels, flights, destinations, holiday types, beaches and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://bigtravelweb.com/travel/2008/04/14/never-buy-lonely-planet-why/#comment-1233</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigtravelweb.com/travel/2008/04/14/never-buy-lonely-planet-why/#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Go point Jack - I agree that the latest edition of Lonely Planet's Colombia book is actually remarkably good. They received so much bad publicity about the previous edition, it seems the newest one got worked on heavily.  So well done LP for fixing it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go point Jack - I agree that the latest edition of Lonely Planet&#8217;s Colombia book is actually remarkably good. They received so much bad publicity about the previous edition, it seems the newest one got worked on heavily.  So well done LP for fixing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://bigtravelweb.com/travel/2008/04/14/never-buy-lonely-planet-why/#comment-1232</link>
		<author>Jack</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigtravelweb.com/travel/2008/04/14/never-buy-lonely-planet-why/#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>Wrong. I tried Footprint for Central America and was fairly disappointed. LP is good in the sense it provides a good and quickly accessible overview. The info in the 2009 Colombia edition was pretty accurate, up to date and very helpful. Don't know about RG, Frommers and Bradt though, they may be good as well or even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong. I tried Footprint for Central America and was fairly disappointed. LP is good in the sense it provides a good and quickly accessible overview. The info in the 2009 Colombia edition was pretty accurate, up to date and very helpful. Don&#8217;t know about RG, Frommers and Bradt though, they may be good as well or even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
